Strike: No arrears, no resumption, ASUU dares FG
The Academic Staff Union of Universities on Thursday said it would not call off its strike until the salary arrears of its members were paid.
The university lecturers also said they would not teach students to make up for the six months they had been on strike if the Federal Government failed to pay for the “period of strike.”
The union’s national president, Prof Emmanuel Osodeke, disclosed this to The PUNCH in response to a statement by the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, that the Federal Government would not concede to ASUU’s demands for the backlog of salaries withheld within the period.
The PUNCH reports that ASUU embarked on a one-month warning strike on February 14. However, the union has extended the strike several times in the past six months.
Other associations such as the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities, Non-Academic Staff Union of Allied and Educational Institutions and National Association of Academic Technologists later followed suit, shutting down public universities nationwide.
Adamu had told State House correspondents on Thursday that the government would not pay the lecturers for the period of strike.
But reacting to the government’s position, Osodeke said, “He is joking. If they fail to pay, we will not teach those students; we won’t make up for that period. We will start a new session (2022/2023). We won’t conduct examinations; we will start a fresh session totally.
“Lecturers are not doctors that once life is gone, it can’t be brought back. For lecturers, we can still resume where we stopped and still teach them and make up for lost time. But for us, if they fail to pay we won’t make up for the lost time. We won’t go back to fill backlogs; the schools will start a new session, 2022/2023. Examinations and the period lost won’t be taught.”
He added, ‘’If they want to do ‘no work no pay,’ we will also do ‘no pay no work.’ If they won’t pay the backlog, we won’t teach the backlog. We are not like other workers. He doesn’t know what he is saying.”
‘FG’s offer miserable’
Explaining why the meeting with the government had been unable to resolve the lingering strike in a statement on Thursday, Osodeke explained that the government’s offer was poor.
He disclosed that the union told the Federal Government through the ministry of education to return to the New Draft Agreement of the 2009 FGN/ASUU Renegotiation Committee whose work spanned a total of five and half years as a demonstration of good faith.
The PUNCH had reported that last Tuesday, ASUU met with the government through the Prof Nimi Briggs committee.
The statement titled, ‘Why ASUU rejects government’s award of salary’, read, “The major reason given by the Federal Government for the miserly offer-paucity of revenue, is not tenable.
“This is because of several reasons, chief of which is poor management of the economy. This has given rise to leakages in the revenue of governments at all levels. There is wasteful spending, misappropriation of funds and outright stealing of our collective patrimony.
“ASUU believes that if the leakages in the management of the country’s resources are stopped, there will be more than enough to meet the nation’s revenue and expenditure targets without borrowing and plunging the country into a debt crisis as is the case now.”
Osodeke in the statement explained that the government imposed the ongoing strike action on ASUU, saying the FG encouraged it to linger because of its provocative indifference.
The union further said, “The Munzali Jibril-led renegotiation committee submitted the first Draft Agreement in May 2021, but the government’s official response did not come until about one year later! Again, awards presented by the Nimi Briggs-led Team came across in a manner of take-it-or-leave-it on a sheet of paper. No serious country in the world treats their scholars this way.”
It stressed that the government’s surreptitious move to set aside the principle of collective bargaining, which was globally in practice, had the potential of damaging lecturers’ psyche and destroying their commitment to the university system.
According to ASUU, rejecting a salary package arrived at through collective bargaining is a repudiation of the government’s pronouncements on reversing brain drain.
However, speaking to journalists at the 47th session of the State House Ministerial Media Briefing organized by the Presidential Communications Team at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, the education minister said ASUU’s demands to be paid salaries for the six-month strike period is stalling its negotiations with the union.
Adamu assured that five of the striking university-based unions will return to work within the next one week, whereas ASUU’s remain uncertain.
He denied receiving a two-week ultimatum from the President, adding that he successfully concluded his work one week after meeting with him on July 18.
‘No deadline’
The minister explained: “The President never gave me any deadline. I promised that I could do it within the shortest possible time. And for your information, one week after that pledge, I had already finished my job because I had given all the six unions the offer made by the government, and I want to tell you, in principle, all of them accepted it.
“The only exception was ASUU that gave me two other conditions, which I told them would not be acceptable to the government. So, I can tell you within the next one week, these five unions will call off the strike. But I cannot say the same for ASUU.”
He said the lecturers were insisting that they should be paid for the period they were on strike.
“And I told them the Federal Government will not. All contentious issues between the government and ASUU had been settled except the quest for members’ salaries for the period of strike to be paid, a demand that Buhari has flatly rejected.”
The minister therefore said the demand by ASUU to be paid salaries for the six-month strike period was stalling its negotiations with the union.
Adamu also argued that ASUU should bear the liability of compensating university students for the time wasted, not the FG.
According to him, if the students are determined to get compensated, they should take ASUU and other striking unions to court and claim damages incurred over the strike period.
He regretted that ASUU proceeded with the strike despite the Buhari regime and agencies such as TETFUND and UBEC directly investing N2.5tn into education.
Adamu, however, noted that renegotiations are ongoing, adding, “we are doing everything humanly possible to conclude the negotiations. I am sure that the current efforts would yield the desired results and return our children back to school.”
The minister also disclosed that although the ASUU-proposed University Transparency Accountability Solution and University Peculiar Personnel and Payroll System out-performed the government-backed Integrated Personnel Payroll and Information System in the efficiency tests conducted, the FG has not approved UTAS as claimed in some quarters.
Consequently, he said the FG will integrate ASUU’s peculiarities in any of the platforms eventually adopted.
This includes updating IPPIS to now accommodate payment of lecturers on sabbatical.
Adamu lamented that some governors of Northern states are “destroying” education at the primary school level through mismanagement.
Almajiri system
The minister also said the almajiri system inherited from the Jonathan administration was not properly implemented.
Adamu revealed that the FG had so far identified 70 illegal universities and 125 Colleges of Education.
He said in spite of the efforts of the Muhammadu Buhari regime at ensuring unfettered access to university education, the challenges posed by illegal universities still persist.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Nigerian Students explained its position on the demand by the minister that ASUU should be sued.
This was contained in a statement signed by the union’s President, Sunday Asefon, on Thursday.
Asefon was reacting to the statement by the education minister that the affected students should “take ASUU to court” to claim damages incurred over the strike period.
Responding, the NANS President said it could not sue ASUU, noting that the union is neither a proprietor nor beneficiary of fees paid.
The statement read in part, “Perhaps, the only thing Malam Adamu Adamu has gotten right since he became a minister is the fact that Nigerian students needed to be compensated for their wasted time, opportunities and resources.
‘’However, the minister is clever by half by suggesting ASUU should be held liable for the liabilities. ASUU is neither the proprietor of our tertiary institutions nor the beneficiary of the exorbitant fees we pay across our tertiary institutions in Nigeria.’’
In a related development, the Royal Commonwealth Society, Nigeria branch, has pledged to mediate between the striking lecturers and the FG using the instrument of ‘academic diplomacy.’
The Country Director of the society, Mr Blackson Bayewumi, said this in a statement made available to the News Agency of Nigeria in Abuja on Thursday.
Bayewumi appealed to ASUU to embrace meaningful dialogue, consultations and compromise at resolving the prolonged academic strike.
